This book is a collection of seven essays actually by a group of folks: John Berger, Sven Blomberg, Chris Gox, Michael Dibb, and Richard Hollis. It’s based on a BBS television series Berger did, but I haven’t watched that so I can’t comment on it too much. The idea is that this is a series of essays elaborating on the ideas from the series, and thinking about the format of the ideas as well. To this end, four of the essays have words and images and three are images only.
The first essay is about sight in general and how we portray and frame images, especially paintings. It is even noted in the text, it interacts with Walter Benjamin’s “Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” as it talks about photography and how that changes how we see art today. The next is a visual essay, and this one was clear to me, it’s about the male gaze. Essay three elaborates on this in words, how women are portrayed as objects for men to consume and such (none of the authors are female I will note).
The second half is where it gets a bit obscure for me. The fourth essay is pictorial and I assume it is about the contradictions in oil painting as that is how it’s described in the brief intro, but I am not sure what those are. Especially since all of the paintings are small and black and white, I like the idea but I am lost here folks. The next essay does discuss oil paintings, primarily about possession. To own a painting is to own what it portrays, that sort of thing. The next visual essay is similar, I’m not totally sure what it’s getting at, and the final essay talks about art in advertisements and publicity and how that can contrast with the news at the time.
In general I thought this was a really interesting read. It has been a while since I read anything about art criticism and art history so I really enjoyed this short form of essays about different ideas. I even appreciate what the authors were going for with the visual essays! I think it’s a really interesting idea to present images with minimal text even identifying the images and let the viewer draw what they may. It kinda ends there for me though, on a practical sense if you are writing an essay you want the viewer to leave with the point of the essay. And I have no idea if I got that point. I don’t think I did, really, I noticed some themes but they were very surface level. Maybe if this wasn’t an essay and just a more loosely ended path it could make more sense. Or if there were just minimal words or arrows or something to communicate with the reader!
The essays with text though I really liked. I thought the initial essay you might want some familiarity with Benjamin, but that’s not necessary you can follow it just as is. The second if it wasn’t for the dudes writing about women I would probably really enjoy. There’s a very interesting discussion about how the Western form of art inherently objectifies women through tropes and just how we are used to them being portrayed. Which is so fascinating, especially because they expand to other cultures. Folks in the art world are so narrow in their view of art, you rarely see comparisons to other cultures. The oil painting and possessions one I think was my least favorite, there are a lot of ideas tossed together in that one that could have used more space. And the last essay almost completes the circle, it talks about advertisements which are reproduced images. In particular I think in the age of the Internet and Twitter, it is important to think about the images we see and what those mean, whether it’s news or an ad. None of it was super groundbreaking, I’ve seen discussions of photos and photojournalism before, but I hadn’t seen ads directly contrasted with photojournalism previously. And that might be over, we rarely see physical newspapers that will directly have an ad opposite a story. So I quite liked that one as well.
This was a short book, but quite interesting. I’m glad that
I had the opportunity to pick it up, it was under high demand at the local
library (I’m not quite sure why but cool). I will probably try to check out
that BBC series and see how it intersects with this work.