First of all, there’s Andrew Lloyd Weber. Now I like “The
Phantom of the Opera” as much as the next person, but it has everything to do
with the plot and not with the music. (Also “Evita” is so much worse than “Phantom”.)
He must consistently run out of ideas halfway through writing the music because
every song has the same theme, the same melody, and the only thing that varies
are the words or the accompaniment. The entire show sounds like monotony as a
result, exactly the opposite of what you want a musical to be. And “Evita” is
an opera, so there’s no talking involved, which makes it even worse because all
you get is the “Don’t Cry for Me Argentina” melody for about two hours. And
even then, there is very little flow to the music, it’s like he’s throwing
darts at the staff and putting down notes where the darts land. Long story
short, Weber has very little creativity.
And then there’s the problem that a lot of modern, rock
musicals fall into. They come up with a decent plot, and then the music just
isn’t memorable. It sounds as though they took monologues and set it to a beat.
Musicals are supposed to become earworms and have clever lyrics, that’s what
audiences remember them for.
But of course, they all get a cult following anyway because
of the subject matter. They nearly all deal with some sort of issue that
becomes a tearjerker. (Note: this doesn’t apply to all of these musicals.
“Hedwig and the Angry Inch” or “RENT” are amazing. To contrast, “Next to Normal”
is not.)
So what you really need for a good musical are composers who
actually put thought into the words and music, and don’t just take the lazy way
out. You would think that this would be obvious, but it very obviously isn’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment