Saturday, May 23, 2015

THE BIRTH OF THE STACH-EDY or Truth and Illusion or I Try to Pass my Finals

So I decided to write my final paper for philosophy on illusions and the fundamental truth that they hide from us in Friedrich Nietzsche’s The Birth of Tragedy. I’m having quite the time. Here’s a summary of what I’m talking about.

Illusions start with dreams. They are a precondition to art, where the artist realizes that they are illusions and then applies them to their art. This takes place in two forms: the Apollonian and the Dionysian. The Apollonian is the statelier of the two and is often associated with epic poetry and sculptures. The Dionysian is associated with intoxication and wild music and dancing (aka your Saturday night). Both of these forces are illusions since they are dreams in art form, and are never mistaken for reality. They can give insight into the nature of the world, which will be discussed later. One difference between these forces is that the Apollonian often reinforces the conception of the individual, while the Dionysian breaks it down into the primal oneness of all beings.

One source of Apollonian illusion was the Greek gods. The Greeks created gods that were so vibrant, they hid this truth at the root of existence and gave them a reason to keep living. They provided a justification for the life of man through their gods. This was incorporated into their culture unconsciously since it wouldn’t have an effect otherwise, but the gods are still of their creation and show their tendencies to hide from the truth so they could continue living.

The relationship between the Dionysian and the truth is based on the Dionysian man’s insight into the world. The thrill of the Dionysian and breaking down the boundaries is what attracts people to it, but this leads to the truth being revealed to them. After repeatedly partaking in the intoxication and ecstasies of the Dionysian, the two worlds become separate, with reality becoming inferior to the intoxication. But there is no avoiding the real world since they must always return to it and any action that they take is futile. This is the Dionysian man’s insight: that no matter what he does he cannot change the nature of the world. Logically this would lead to nihilism, however Nietzsche considers nihilism to be an outlook on life rather than the nature of it. So life could be meaningless, but as long as one continued to embrace life then one wouldn’t be a nihilist. The Dionysian helps with this as it supplies a metaphysical consolation that life is fundamentally positive by breaking down boundaries into the primal oneness.

This Dionysian wisdom is similar to the Greek cheerfulness that permeates their society. This so-called cheerfulness also comes from the wisdom of Silenus, who in a myth told King Midas that the best thing for mankind is to not be, and the second best is to die soon. These two ideas (that actions change nothing and that it is better to be dead) constitute the essential truth at the root of life. Art alone is what can help deal with this knowledge and continue living in spite of it.

Then everything changed when Socratism came along. Socratism is the belief that one can get to know the world by knowing more about it, and equates knowledge and explicability with virtue and happiness. This is an optimistic outlook because it believes that everything in life can be fixed if we only know more about it. This scientific basis opposes the artistic Apollonian and Dionysian, and effectively destroys them in the end. As artistic forces, neither the Apollonian nor the Dionysian can be easily explained and so are seen as bad by the Socratics. Socratism also destroys myths as it tries to find a historical basis for them and disregards their value as stories to the Greek culture. However, Socratism is still an illusion that hides the truth from us just like the Apollonian and the Dionysian. It’s just that Socratics take their illusion to be reality while the others know them to be illusions. Also, Socratism only works when you limit yourself to a certain set of problems while avoiding others (like the Dionysian wisdom) so it fundamentally cannot address every aspect of life.

There are a few flaws with Socratism. At the end of Socrates’ life, he started to make music, indicating that he recognized the limits of logic. This is the result of the limits of science, since it is still an illusion. Science can really only describe objects and phenomenon, it can never really explain them. In the end, this results in a need for art instead of science to supply meaning. However, this leads to conflict as Socratism teaches to avoid art. To Nietzsche, this conflict lasted until the present day. But he is confident that through the image of the music making Socrates, society will be able to embrace art again.

Nietzsche is putting a huge emphasis on art and its ability to redeem our existence here, and this is a role that it may not live up to in the end. It’s what will ultimately bring meaning into our lives after facing the knowledge that life is worth living and there is nothing we can do to change this, and science is incapable of performing this role.

No comments:

Post a Comment